When I was reading
the article, the exceptional case about Sara made me think of the western part
of China, the very poor area education.
Here is a video
about the area, I would like to share.
According to China’s
sustainable development strategy report of 2012, there are 128 million poverty populations
in China, whose annual income is under 2300yuan RMB (416,760WON) which is the
similar amount of Japan’s population and more than two times of South Korea’s
population.
From this video, we
can see what they got for children education.
Of course, China
government has made policies to help them and some enterprise has donated money
to build schools for them, which is called hope primary school in Chinese. Some
social organizations has called people to donate clothes and books for them,
university students spend summer and winter vocations to teach them.
However, except for
these basic needs, no one care further more about their education quality. Why?
Because having a proper school, have real desks and benches, enough books,
pencils and notebooks are already good enough for them? All this stuff, even
high technology multimedia, has been taken for granted in our daily education. What
do we care for our education? Do students like the teaching method? Does the
education promote students to integrated education? Is banking education or
problem-posing education good for students?
But do people have
this similar concern to these poverty children?
Therefore, my first question
is
Does this critical pedagogy suitable for
them?
Or do
these children need critical education?
Think about this:
what kinds of issues do we talk about under critical pedagogy:
Ideology, racism,
sexism, feminism and other social class issues. Do these poverty children care
about these social issues? Do these children need this kind of critical
pedagogy?
Yes, I think they
need critical pedagogy in their education even more than us.
o
The
proposer of critical pedagogy Paulo Freire had a poor life when he was young;
he said “I didn't
understand anything because of my hunger. I wasn't dumb. It wasn't lack of
interest. My social condition didn't allow me to have an education. Experience
showed me once again the relationship between social class and knowledge"
(Freire). This influenced his decision to dedicate his life to improving
the lives of the poor. Therefore, I believe that the poor kids need critical
education more than us.
However, what
kind of critical pedagogy do they need?
Do they care about
the social issues that we mentioned before?
I like the sentence
in the first article: actual experience is quite different from hypothetical
solutions!
I have another video
to show:
Their parents
working in the city’s construction sites, factories and other dirty and messy
places those native citizens don’t like to work at. Their dreams are going to
work like their parents.But, they are called "Migrant workers".
No comments:
Post a Comment